To: webartery@yahoogroups.com
From: mez breeze <netwurker@hotkey.net.au>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 08:46:35 +1100
Subject: Re:  Re: hypertext

At 10:23 PM 16/02/2003 +0000, you wrote:

>I actually do buy that form and content are one====which is why i
>insist on digital content's "painterliness"===when i create a piece,
>i want the content to be dynamic, i want it to vary...i want the
>content to be a collaboration among the user, the machine, and
>myself===


::col.lab[i]a naked, vacant concept with red M white striped [bench.]markas

::collaboration.as.d.<con>fined.via.static.proscribed.synergism is BLANK.


>this is why digital writing that doesn't take into account
>the computer's propensity for variability sometimes leaves me
>cold...

this is why <conceptual theorising> that doesn't take into account
the com.p[erson realignment]uter's propensity for variability sometimes 
leaves me
cold...

>i feel stuck outside the piece, when the point of the network
>is participation===

s[t]uck<ling>.pigged.and obtuse.frozen.




- pro][tein][.logging.txt
-
-

http://www.hotkey.net.au/~netwurker/
_
_sparks of lost hu][bris][man $cent][+re.sieved][_



 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Back to nettime unstable digest vol 35