Return-Path: Received: from mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.1.48] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.11) for paragram@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 10 Nov 2002 12:15:12 +0100 (CET) Received: by Mail.ZEDAT.FU-Berlin.DE (Smail3.2.0.98) from n2.grp.scd.yahoo.com (66.218.66.75) with smtp id ; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 06:16:49 +0100 (MET) X-eGroups-Return: sentto-64825-19232-1036905406-cantsin=zedat.fu-berlin.de@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.66.95] by n2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Nov 2002 05:16:46 -0000 X-Sender: talan@memmott.org X-Apparently-To: webartery@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 10 Nov 2002 05:16:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 85483 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2002 05:16:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Nov 2002 05:16:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakemtao04.cox.net) (68.1.17.241) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Nov 2002 05:16:46 -0000 Received: from default ([68.9.134.193]) by lakemtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with SMTP id <20021110051647.JTFW1315.lakemtao04.cox.net@default> for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 00:16:47 -0500 Message-ID: <005c01c28879$eb15f3e0$c1860944@ri.cox.net> To: References: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 From: "Talan Memmott" X-Yahoo-Profile: talanperc MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list webartery@yahoogroups.com; contact webartery-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list webartery@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 00:27:53 -0500 Subject: Re: [webartery] Fwd: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: "digital p[h]e[ave]tting" v(s[t] art)-sp(ac)eak Reply-To: webartery@yahoogroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UIDL: VR%#!ecV!!9dI"!ncG"! Content-Length: 972 > cave.work emerging as 3d caves become more common - it might even be > transmittable through InternetII - Alan > The main things that will be needed for network cave.work, aside from bandwidth, are display technologies -- the price of goggles is steep, and they just aren't widely available because there is not much use outside of a CAVE, and there will have to be a shift to stereo monitors (fish tanks as they're called) that display on three screens... Still the body effect of the CAVE will be lost to the 'home user' if this is the route taken... I suppose more of a 'holodeck' approach is possible with multiple projectors, like making the room the display, but this is not too economically reasonable. The programming for the CAVE will have to get a lot less burdensome as well, even with broadband and Internet II.... But there is huuuuuuuuge potential in these spaces...