Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 15:20:28 -0700 From: kara quarles Reply-To: "WRYTING-L : Writing and Theory across Disciplines" To: WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA Subject: TELIC BEAUTIESh/One Shape(s) "of Senseless Production" TELIC BEAUTIESh/One Shape(s) "of Senseless Production" {H-arch}: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: SHONESHAPES/SHONESHAPES/SHONESHAPES/SHONESHAPES/ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: BillyBudd[01] make floower: grapolo [crane vs. ape] h/there are no parts h/only filters h/wide is the sloth h/and many its masks BillyBudd[02] make floower: umbela grapolo (korimbo) [worm vs. rat] h/all filters are reifications h/of historical constructs h/whose aggregate masses h/encourage inertia among morphological families BillyBudd[03] make floower: spiko [dog vs. tiger] h/every act of seeing is h/then an act of destruction h/and an act of creation h/all vision is a redetermination BillyBudd[04] make floower: amento [rhino vs. mantis] h/new forms of labor h/are needed to produce h/an aesthetics broad enough h/to incorporate production which does not sense (ie. senseless production) BillyBudd[05] make floower: spadiko [turtle vs. butterfly] h/there are a host of examples from h/the world of anthropology and h/especially the study of various h/forms of divination BillyBudd[06] make floower: kunmetita spiko, pseudospiko [sparrow vs. centipede] h/in most domains the perception of production h/becomes enmeshed so deeply within the domain h/itself that any separation of the two destabilizes h/both production and perception leaving only a hightened sense of (un)sense BillyBudd[07] make floower: paniklo [tapir vs. marmoset] h/the terror of the senseless is that it cannot h/readily be taken up into a preexisting scheme h/or series often being labeled as waste matter h/bad unproductive vile worthless silly terrorism madness etc. BillyBudd[08] make floower: umbela paniklo [python vs. koala] h/if indeed production's essence is disclosed through its h/moments of breakdown what is disclosed through h/an agency whose duty is to camouflage such events h/as moments in which the series is seen to be repaired BillyBudd[09] make floower: spika grapolo [bushbaby vs. hippo] h/can then all production be seen to be a machinic effect whose h/meaning is purely coincidental purely contingent a rapt disjuncture h/smoothly performing its failure to senses produced within its primary facticity h/hence blind to the complete array, the series as a totality beyond experience BillyBudd[010] make floower: ? [flea vs. whale] h/what sense other than another layer of disjunction can intentionality h/hope to perform when production itself laying outside the domain h/of perception except as a science of interference whose subsequent h/morphology as a nexus of the senseless runs parallel to production BillyBudd[011] make floower: umbelo [cricket vs. man] h/when all forms of production are seemingly forms of a primary and senseless h/mechanicity an utterly repetitive series of intrasystemic actions of arrangement h/embodiment and dissolution the movement of which would allude to a universal h/irony whose components are interchangeable simulated and altogether pure BillyBudd[012] make floower: kunmetita umbelo (duobla umbelo) [shark vs. sheep] h/how has the fundamental disquiet and masquerade of this primary facticity of h/machinic effects been written into the core programming as something h/other than pure contingency within a system whose material circumstance h/has no sense other than as a series whose intentionality is seen as an interference effect h/of intersubjectivities (ie. the friction of aggregates) BillyBudd[013] make floower: dikotoma cumo (pseudoumbelo) [ibex vs. ferret] h/what composes a human dialogue when there is no human no dialogue h/and no substance other than as the subject for a science of interferences h/itself a product of intersubjective forces of variance at play h/how can production hope to produce something other than a senseless h/reification of historical frictions or fictions which themselves are the substance of intentionality BillyBudd[014] make floower: ? [yak vs. fluke] h/is then the failure of the science of interference where the power of the h/intersubjective forces of production and hence intentionality arrive from h/how does production as a series outside experience come to view itself h/as a wide sloth whose masks are legion whose union resides at the particle BillyBudd[015] make floower: kapo [iguana vs. horse] h/there are no masks only parts h/and within these parts are the perfect seeds of experience h/experience transcends all science h/the science of experience nullifies production sense intentionality the entire series BillyBudd[016] make floower: kapitulo (korbeto) [owl vs. hyena] h/experience is its own domain h/its rules are random and self designated h/the rules can be disguised as a series of un-rules h/the archive of experience is not a senseless production BillyBudd[017] make floower: konuso (strobilo) [giraffe vs. eel] h/the machinic effect while somewhat dehumanizing can also h/call into question the nature of production as a sensible process h/whose contours are determined by success and failure h/although the series is still much too long to be sensible h/except to the science of interference